Kiefer Likens
All work

012 — Web

High-anxiety search, high-ticket decision.

Client
A+ Foundation Repair Company
Industry
Residential foundation repair
Engagement
Client work
Status
Pre-launch
Role
Design
Stack
Next.js, CSS Modules, Static generation

Deployment note — Build is on a preview URL and is not serving on a client-owned domain.

A+ Foundation Repair homepage: black, red, and yellow contractor layout with the headline ‘Is Your Biggest Investment Sinking?’.
Homepage

02

Problem

Foundation repair is bought in a state of alarm, at high cost, from whoever seems most credible in the first ten minutes of searching.

03

Insight

Lead with the fear the buyer already has, then answer it with credentials and a free evaluation. The hero asks whether their biggest investment is sinking, because that is the sentence already in their head.

04

Execution

Seven routes with six named services, a service area, an FAQ, and a single free-evaluation conversion path, carrying correct local-business structured data with geo coordinates.

05 — Evidence

Each figure is labeled with where it came from — observed in the build, published by the client, or published by a partner. Nothing here is an unsourced performance claim.

  • Routes

    7

    Observed in build

  • Known open defects

    2 — contradictory statistics, imagery

    Observed in build

No outcome data. The build is in the archive rather than the case-study set deliberately.

06 — Reflection

Reflection

Two things keep this in the archive. The published project count contradicts itself on a single page — one thousand-plus in the statistics band, three thousand four hundred and fifty-seven a section later — and the imagery reads as generated rather than photographed, in a trade where proof-of-work photographs are the sales asset. Both are fixable in an afternoon and both have to be fixed before this deserves more prominence.